This is very well represented by the Watergate Scandal, which started when burglars were caught placing wiretapping phones and stealing important documents. Nixons presidency was considered imperial because of how controlling he acted. This forced him to retire, which no president has ever done. In other words your definition was somewhat correct but it isnt necessarily true all the time. In which many crimes and burglaries were being committed for the sake of re-electing president Nixon, an example of this was CREEP, which would fake democratic documents against the Democratic nomination of 1972, George McGovern. One of the biggest issues was the antipathetic Vietnam War. The matters are different due to one being about war and the other being about a political matter (bank). Well done, I agree with most of your statements and judgement of Nixons Presidency, I couldnt have said it any better. He had voice recordings of all conversations and kept denying he didnt, and to attempt solving this he fired the Watergate investigators, making things suspicious. Nixons presidency was considered imperialistic because of him taking actions into his own hands and not consulting congress. I also liked how you gave detailed explanations on how Nixon did actions without consulting with congress. Reagean although very different to also shared some of Nixons Ideals like the fact that they both concurred that big government was the true problem with America. This action was never approved by Congress, as it has the power to grant permission to wage war, and was hidden from the public. Hey there french buddy! Nixons goal was to hurt the communist there and to help the non-communist. Citizens of the US didnt know what was going on in their own country. This angered everyone who hated the fact that he secretly bombed a nation that had no involvement in the war without the approval of congress thus his imperial rule. His presidency was both similar and different from past presidents in how he handled either domestic or foreign issues. This means he broke many laws while in presidency. Both of them didnt believe that the government helped at all and that it was never a solution for anyone. Nixon then ordered to invade Cambodia so congress passed the War Powers Act which he would soon veto. Nixon also had power over the executive branch, he reorganized it and made decisions without consulting congress.

Nixons presidency was considered imperial because there are examples of him acting upon things that were not consulted by any of the members of congress. It was from this point his lack of empathy for the peoples opinions really showed his imperialistic nature. And indeed, it helped Nixon gain support, and helped him win the election. For instance ,when Nixon invaded Cambodia without Congresss permission . He used his power for his own benefits. Conclusion who? He domestically abused his right of using the bureaucracy by replacing cabinet members of the White House with his own people. He would also frequently disregard congresses concern, and vetoed bills liberally. Though he didnt always use the Friendly Neighbor approach, it still led to having better associations with them, clearing for a path of the end of the Cold War. Unlike past presidents who have abused their power such as Lincoln, Nixon abused his power as president to benefit no one but himself, which the people did not like. I wouldve mentioned more about Nixons presidency in relations to others like adding on how JFK shared his views on communism like how they both wanted and attempted to contain it and probably adding another person as another example. You talked about the blank check from the Tonkin Gulf resolution but you did not justify what exactly he used this for and why. Through his election a presidency Nixons promised Americans that he will stop the war and return troops. This war was referred to the Vietnam war. This pressured the Soviet Union into taking steps to lessen some of the tensions with the U.S. as well by limiting antiballisitic missiles and nuclear weapons under the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks. He felt that as president of the United States, he didnt need to explicitly follow the Constitution. For Example, we know that a presidency is considered to be imperialistic when the president especially relies on powers beyond provided by the Constitution. They both abused the limitations of their presidencies, which resulted in Congress disdaining them. Then Congress tried to pass the War Powers Act to limit the presidents war powers, and had to override Nixons veto. Nixon refused to spend funds suggested by congress, changed cabinet positions without going by congress, and ordered bombing raids + harbors to be mined, during the Vietnam War, without going by congress first. He did whatever he can for his own benefit. And the way the IRS was trying to find all the negative talk with the people to secure his presidency for the next term also made him look really bad. The New deal was certainly not bad, all I meant was that he expanded the power of the executive branch by overusing his presidential power. In the same way, Nixon ordered the containment policy to be enforced in the Vietnam War to aid South Vietnam, which was another foreign country that also needed the U.Ss military assistance. Nixons involvement in the Watergate Scandal was another example of his misgovernment. This can be similarly represented by President John Adams midnight justice appointments in which he appointed federalist judges to their supreme court upon leaving office. Another factor that added to Nixons imperialistic empire was when he could not accept that congress was shifting liberal. You also gave a pretty open statement and should of went into more detail on the events that lead up to his actions (why he went to please the silent majority) and the events that happened in that time frame. Similarly to Nixon, Thomas Jefferson resorted to abuse of power when dealing with issues, specifically the Louisiana Purchase. This would soon be exposed to the public, including an enemies list, which contained innocent citizens with opposing opinions. This would be an approach to hinder the battling, anyway it will in the long run drag out the war and its loss of life. The era was a time of increased trade and cooperation with the Soviet Union and the signing of the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) treaties. As later proved by evidence, Nixons CREEP ( Committee to Re-Elect the President ) were behind this. These all show us how he was imperial due to the fact he was not consulting with the rest of the government and citizens on what do, he did as he pleased. As people hoped were up Nixon abolished that plan and then did an attack on Cambodia whiteout the congresses approves. Rereading the question made me realize I didnt go into much detail about Nixons domestic policies. Despite the nation being a silent majority, opposing its involvement in the Vietnamese war, Richard Nixon continued to lead through imperialistic actions and entanglements with foreign affairs throughout his 1969 presidency. It was a good thing that helped the people after and made them feel secure. The Majority of the American public, most commonly the young youth was outraged at the declaration of war against vietnam. It really seemed like they cared for making the enviornment a better place. The bombing of Cambodia without congressional approval stirred up massive protest with the doves who believed that the United States should not have invaded neutral Cambodia. His actions in foreign affairs and his misuse of power at the home front proves that Nixon was an imperial president. Another imperialistic advance Richard Nixon took on was when he replaced cabinet members with conservative justices he chose. He bombed North Vietnamese forces in that country even after a cease-fire had been declared.

Nixon being a conservative himself began appointing his own conservative justices. Although while Nixon wanted to continuously act on foreign affairs, Kennedy saw it was nothing but trouble. It seems, however, you did not go into much detail about how he addressed domestic issues such as civil rights which are mentioned in your opening paragraph. Although the role of US involvement was controversial at the beginning of the war, the public later shifted to a much stronger position opposing war due to the secret bombings of Cambodia. FDR didnt abuse his power because it was a recovery from the Great Depression. The largest issue in America at the time was with the highly opposed Vietnam War, one of the longest wars in American history. Kennedy believed that your apperence matters that people were more likely to vote for you if you looked nice and if you confident when you gave your speeches while Nixon disagreed with this philosophy . Nixons use of excessive vetos led his termination, but not mainly. He was also essential in ending the Vietnam war. Richard Nixons many undesirable actions surpassed his presidential powers. His interventionist actions such as assisting in the ArabIsraeli conflict and staging a coup in Chile (something not mentioned in the textbook) were very similar to Eisenhowers approval of a coup in Iran and his funding of the South Vietnamese in their own conflict. His watergate scandal also made him unpopular with the people. Their corrupt ways threatened the democracy that many Americans worship. He had help from the CREEPS .But once this scandal was revealed he denied having any part in it which made everything so much worse . But despite bringing a time of detente, it should be noted that Nixon was still boldly against communism. How was his presidency both similar and different to past presidents in how he handled either domestic or foreign issues.. I would just say that you could have gone more in depth with the second part of the question, overall. The Watergate scandal showed Nixons obstruction of justice and how willing he was to become re-elected. Nixons continuous abuse of power whilst increasing overseas involvement, which was extremely opposed by many, resulting in primarily college riots, did much to establish his imperial stance. Overall the comparisons of the diff presidents were great. With the Cold War, JFK uses force ( using troops for say) while Nixon negotiated with China and Russia, making an agreement and having better relationships with them, slowly making a path for the end of the Cold War. Richard nixon was president in an era in need of a stringent president to regulate foreign and domestic affairs such as those concerning politics and war. Additionally, Nixons intention to withdraw from the war with the U.S.s honor intact could be interpreted as egotistical in some manner, just like a king. Nixon likewise had the Vietnamization approach that fairly hindered the war yet hauled it on longer then it ought to have as I would like to think. Nixon tried his best and hardest to cover up for the burglary. Nixons abuse of power included the bombing of Cambodia. What first caught my eye was the inclusion of American precedents and how Nixon betrayed or broke them. You did forget to include the second part the question in your response though, which was to compare Nixon to a previous president, An imperial president is uncontrollable, and exceeds the power assigned by the constitution. An example of this was the continuation of the Vietnamese war. Your email address will not be published. Nixon made a lot of decisions that upset the people, for example: during the Watergate Break-in five men, who were a part of CREEP (the committee to reelect the president) had been caught breaking into the democratic partys headquarters in the Watergate building. It was not uncommon for him to act without informing congress beforehand. Overall, I liked your detailed examples and thoroughly specified examples based on the question. In the paragraph you used in my opinion, and what I like about that is how you implemented this phrase in your discussion because it gives off a professional vibe that you indeed know what you are talking about and you do intend to give your views on the matter. It shares a message of hope through sacrifice. Thus using these different analogies and comparisons we can conclude that each president has their own sets of beliefs regarding foreign interventions, and how to handle domestic affairs; from neutrality to full out war we can see the effects they leave behind. Under Nixons presidency, many laws were passed in protection of the environment, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, the Clean Air Act, etc. Both policies differed becauses of the causes of both presidents actions. This is only because the word youth itself means young. Nixons presidency was considered an imperial presidency because he would never consult with any of the congress members for the majority of his decisions. In that sense, Nixon had very similar presidential ideals like LBJ and FDR. Like Nixon, Hardings administration was spreading corruption through the teapot dome scandal, men in workings with Harding sold federal oil reserves through bribes. Nixon also violated The Logan Act where he interfered in foreign regulations. He then denied this which made him very unpopular and eventually led to his impeachment. You did really good! In this he was different from Calvin Coolidge, who sought to reduce federal spending. Later white house tape later reveals a smoking gun proving that he had ordered the CIA to stop the FBI from investigating the Watergate break-in. Nixons veto and his accompanying rationale reveal several staple thought processes of Cold War politics in the United States. Nixons next big attempt was his vietnamaztion policy that gradually withdrew troops from Vietnam. He abused the power of the executive branch . It was not the first time this has happened, in fact it was very common for presidents to abuse their power, and veto many bills, but in Nixons case he did it simply to please nobody but himself, and made the American people very upset. An imperialistic is one who makes a policy to extend a countrys power and influence through diplomacy or military force. In response to Nixons invasion of Cambodia, Congress tried to pass legislation to cut off appropriations, but Nixon vetoed it. This shows the extent that Nixon has stretched the presidents power to an uncontrollable degree. Overall I liked it! Our 37th president Richard Nixon had fulfilled many actions that many were not fond of and many did not even know of. As I praised enough, young youth is like referring to a big giant, its weird to say/write. His actions were similar because Both presidents thought in way or another they were higher than congress such Roosevelt attack on the Caribbean or his new deal plan which helped him gain popularity and elected for more than 3 terms. This was all done secretly to find out what his opponents where trying to do and their secrets. Overall his actions as a president were very self serving and hedonistic. Nixons presidency was considered very imperialistic since he directly betrayed the American precedents set by the presidents of America beforehand. Richard Nixon was a conservative, a politician, and he disregarded civil rights. Dont mix up the terms imperialism or imperialistic era and imperial presidency. One stark difference between Nixon and his predecessors Johnson and Eisenhower was his success in establishing diplomatic relations with mainland China. President Nixon had helped in preventing the spread of communism similar to past presidents like JFK, however it was seen as unsuccessful as he introduced the detente that said to respect the differences between countries. I found your answer to be very enlightening. To contain communism Nixon ordered Vietnamization to train the South who were fighting for democracy against the Northern Communist who threatened to subdue them. Nixons presidency was from January 9,1913 to April 22,1994 . For example you could compare his abuse of power to past presidents and how there is similarity there or how he was different by actually going out there to different countries such as Russia and China to resolve foreign issues. Like Lincoln before him, he did pretty much whatever he wanted and even got dirty. Nearing the end of the war, Americas youth were mainly antiwar and in that sense called doves. They were fueled to protest when president Nixon ordered booming strikes on neutral Cambodia.



» Page not found

Page not found or has been removed. Please browse one of our other pages.

Top Slot Sites

Casino Titan

Casino Titan
There’s a free (no-deposit) $7 for new players at Casino Titan plus you also receive up to $3000 in new player Bonuses...

Play Now

Cinema Casino

Cinema Casino
Microgaming is behind another big successful online casino, Cinema Casino. Cinema Casino has over 200 casino games to choose from. This online casino is giving $1000 away for free to try their games and 60 minutes on the clock. ...

Play Now

WinPalace Casino

WinPalace Casino
WinPalace welcomes with an exclusive casino bonus of $1000 CASH ! Get a generous 200% bonus (up to $500) not only on your first but on your 2nd deposit too! This incredible bonus awards you with $1,000 in BONUS CASH! Good luck!...

Play Now

Slots Plus Casino

Slots Plus Casino
Slots Plus Casino have chosen Real Time Gaming software, which offers online players a great gaming experience, which is a step ahead of the rest. 125% welcome bonus is offered to New players at Slot Plus Casino! ...

Play Now

7 Sultans Casino

7 Sultans Casino
9 magical bonuses of $1000 await you at 7 Sultans Casino...

Play Now

Slots Jungle

Slots Jungle
Slots Jungle will match each of your first 10 deposits by 100% up to $1,000 for a grand total of $10,000. No other online casino offers you this much extra free cash to play with. So start cashing in today! To collect, simply redeem bonus code: JUNGLEWELCOME ...

Play Now

Contributors

We Recommend